Why Did Pope Francis Call The Good Fruit Of The Reform Of The Reform “Mistaken”?

According to this report from Zenit, Pope Francis met on Friday, February 19, 2015, with  a group of Roman priests.  The meeting was mostly not recorded officially and only a small part was shared with the media and we have only what those in attendance reported was discussed and what Pope Francis had to say.  One item that I have seen mentioned was the pope’s comments that the issues of married priests might be too difficult to be resolved.

Another is his comments about traditionally oriented seminarians and priests and how so many of them have, well, mental problems, according to him.

His comments struck me as more appropriately directed at the seminarians of the “spirit of Vatican II” mindset, particularly the droves of homosexuals who entered the priesthood aided by the “lavender mafia”, many of whom acted out their pederasty on members of their parishes, especially as I read he warned that allowing these men into the priesthood

“is like placing a ‘mortgage on the Church.’ The underlying problem is that some bishops are sometimes overwhelmed by ‘the need for new priests in the diocese.’ Therefore, an adequate discernment among candidates is not made, among whom some can hide certain ‘imbalances’ that are then manifested in liturgies.”

That was said about traditionally minded seminarians and priests, but what he said was actually a scathing indictment of the other, which is and was, the far more serious and widespread problem, because they did indeed place a mortgage on the Church, one which we all are paying off for many, many years.  As we have heard, Pope Francis doesn’t make judgments about them.  Apparently, judgment is reserved for traditionally oriented seminarians and priests.

However, I am concerned here about his comment regarding the traditional Latin Mass, which we today call the Extraordinary Form of the Liturgy, and the reform of the reform initiated and pursued by Pope Benedict XVI when he issued Summorum Pontificum in 2007 which permits the use of the Tridentine Rite by all priests and without any approval required by their bishops.  Pope Benedict was rightly concerned about the Novus Ordo Mass in the various ways its celebration was done with problematic novelties of ad libbing the rubrics, priestly showmanship, emphasis on the people in the pews and away from the worship of God, and by what had become a de facto break with the past life of the Church after Vatican II.  Pope Benedict intended that the two rites should inform and complement each other and give rise organically in the future to what he saw as a convergence ultimately into one rite for the Church.  As recently as 2011, it was reiterated by Cardinal Koch, president of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, that the reform of the reform was continuing.  Pope Benedict led by example when he reestablished the practice of kneeling for and receiving the Eucharist on the tongue at Papal Masses.

The reform of the reform that he sought and pursued has begun to bear some beautiful fruit.  It has become noticeable and remarkable that there is less novelty and kookiness at Masses, seminarians and young priests are studying the Extraordinary Form, bishops and Cardinals are celebrating Mass in the Extraordinary Form at prominent places and times, more Latin is being brought into Novus Ordo Masses, more and more parishes have reestablished Adoration and Benediction, and past devotional practices have reappeared in parishes.  Indeed, dioceses where more traditionally minded bishops reign have been producing much more seminarians and priests, as well as real nuns, than the others.  Moreover, these effects have coincided with the new translation of the Novus Ordo rite in English, where the Liturgy is a more direct and accurate translation of the Latin, as well as the Faith, which, contrary to the cries of anguish by the “spirit of Vatican II” crowd, has not led to the ignorant pewsitters bewailing their lack of understanding of the “big” words they now hear and say, as they believed them to be and claimed they would.  Another effect has been seen in more places where priests, bishops and Cardinals celebrate the Novus Ordo Mass ad orientem and the emphasis on the sacrificial aspect of the Mass has overshadowed the community meal emphasis of the “spirit of Vatican II” adherents so prevalent over the last few decades.

Because of Pope Benedict, there was a sense for me and many others that Catholicity was being reintroduced and starting to take root and bloom, after a few decades of a real loss of reverence, of real Catholic worship.  Despite some complaints of the hippy crowd, there was a return to normality, with fresh air blowing out the unsettledness and egregious novelties that upset the Mass, and a certain sense of comfort restored.  In most places, we are today more likely to encounter a reverential Mass than a puppet, clown or liturgical dance Mass, whereas previously it was the opposite.

Pope Benedict had also confronted the problem of homosexuals being admitted into seminaries and ordained because of the sexual abuse and pederasty many such men had perpetrated on a grand scale, causing great personal harm to scores of boys and young men, to so many vilified innocent and good priests, to the esteem, respect and moral authority of the Church and Faith, led many Catholics to abandon their Faith in disgust, and bankrupted many dioceses whose bishops had protected these intrinsically disordered men.  Pope Benedict’s bar on active homosexuals and those with such tendencies brought new life back to the seminaries and priesthood, and the priests coming out of most seminaries are solid, real men, priests for the right reasons, and not the pansies of years past.

The reform of the reform was a direct reflection, implementation and manifestation of the restoration of the real Church which had been so abused, maligned and distorted by the “spirit of Vatican II”.  Pope Benedict had made the point repeatedly that what he knew of the Second Vatican Council and what many in the Church at the time thought it would result in, had been something quite different in the way the changes, novelties, distortions and all the rest of the implementation had actually been carried out in subsequent years by so many, leading to emptied pews and the abandonment of the Church and the Faith by so many Catholics.  The reform of the reform was an urgent and necessary undertaking for the restoration of the Church that Pope Benedict took, not just for his papacy, but for the future life of the Church.  He foresaw a new rite would rise organically from the interaction and influence of the two rites on each other, where what is good in both would meld into a true, reverential, beautiful liturgy steeped in tradition yet still modern, with a renewed reverence, and with an emphasis and understanding of the Real Presence of Jesus in the Eucharist, the source and summit of the Faith, which has been so profaned and abused in the past few decades.

Thus we moved with Pope Benedict, until he dropped his bombshell two years ago on it when he abdicated, paving the way to the return of the “spirit of Vatican II” and the opposite of what he sought and had begun.  That bombshell has apparently really exploded on us last Friday.

However, the Pope noted that there are priests and bishops who speak of a “reform of the reform.” Some of them are “saints” and speak “in good faith.” But this “is mistaken”, the Holy Father said. He then referred to the case of some bishops who accepted “traditionalist” seminarians who were kicked out of other dioceses, without finding out information on them, because “they presented themselves very well, very devout.” They were then ordained, but these were later revealed to have “psychological and moral problems.”

Pope Francis seems to think that the Extraordinary Form is some kind of malignant infection that needs to be excised from the Church’s liturgy, not a positive influence as Pope Benedict believed.  Rather than allowing it to thrive and organically meld into a rite of the future with the good of the Novus Ordo rite, he seems to indicate that it is something to be tolerated, but far out on the margins, isolated, where it can not contaminate, and where it will eventually wither and pass away.

We know Pope Francis enjoys puppet Masses and Tango Masses, but why would he be so quick to turn against and throw out the very real and good fruits of the reform of the reform begun by Pope Benedict, calling it “mistaken”?  What bad fruit has the reform of the reform produced?  I have not seen or experienced any such bad fruit and I have not heard anyone else point any out.

Perhaps, I am over-thinking this, or perhaps he was again “misinterpreted”.  Unless and until Pope Francis addresses this again, I am left with the understanding that the reform of the reform will now be brought to an end, that the Novus Ordo, imposed from on high as it was, will not benefit from and be invigorated by the Extraordinary Form, to grow organically as all real Liturgy does and has into a future common rite for the Church as Pope Benedict envisioned, where reverence and true worship would be the norm everywhere, and where the Eucharist would be recognized again as the Real Presence of Jesus, and shown truly to be the source and summit of our Faith.  Of course, this makes perfect sense in light of Pope Francis’ deprecatory comments and ridicule about practicing Catholics, about real Catholics being obedient to God’s Commandments, about his advice to adulterers to profane the Eucharist by receiving while in mortal sin, about his intention to unleash the “pastoral” practice of distributing the Eucharist to those in mortal sin in “irregular” families, about his demeaning of the office of the Papacy and tradition, and about his lack of holding the fullness of the Faith, as I and others have discovered and shown.

Pope Benedict did not provide a to-do list for the implementation of the reform of the reform for all dioceses to undertake according to a schedule.  Instead, he showed us what small but necessary and powerful measures could be taken, such as kneeling for and receiving the Eucharist on the tongue and by his use of traditional vestments of the papal office.  These measures were indeed powerful manifestations of traditional Catholicism that reform the reform, and in many places, reform the deformations that occurred.

Maybe Pope Benedict was wrong about the end result he envisioned, that the reform of the reform would lead to the organic rise of a common rite influenced by the good found in the Extraordinary and Ordinary Forms of the Liturgy in the future.  However, there is no mistake in what he had begun, as evidenced by the fruits we see and experience.

Perhaps, now Pope Francis will ensure that it no longer has fertile soil in which to take root and grow and he wants everyone to know that.

I am deeply troubled by this.  I have lived through the abominations heaped on Catholics by priests and bishops who cared more about the “show” than celebrating a proper, reverential Mass directed toward the right worship of God.  I’ve lived through and still encounter the disrespect and profanation of the Eucharist, of Our Lord, first by those who ought to have known better and then by those who were deprived of the true opportunity to know better, which today is the majority of the laity and even some clergy.  Pope Benedict had started to create the conditions to reverse that, and to prevent it in the future.

Pope Francis seems that he wants all that stuff back.  I can wonder why, I can speculate ulterior motives, but I don’t want to believe the conclusions I am drawing.  But, why else?

Posted in Adoration, Faith, Family, Life, Parish Life, Pope Francis the Muddle-Headed?, Profaning the Eucharist or Trying To, The Mass, The Point of The Blog, The Priesthood
4 comments on “Why Did Pope Francis Call The Good Fruit Of The Reform Of The Reform “Mistaken”?
  1. Margaret Antonas says:

    Pope Francis statements are a real worry for the Church, we must all pray and trust that God will not desert us in these challenging times.


    • steveesq says:

      You are so right, and we also can’t get discouraged and leave the Church which I’m afraid people might do. But we’ve been through so much worse in our lifetimes and in the history of the Church, yet the gates of Hell shall never prevail. Thanks for reading my long post.


  2. Matthew W. I. Dunn says:

    “I am deeply troubled by this.”

    TROUBLING: That’s not a word I’d like to see associated with any Papacy. (But, it has happened before.)

    What scares the hell out of me is that, out of one side of his mouth, His Holiness pronounces some really beautiful insights on the Scriptures and Doctrine, as if the Faith really matters to him — with a “nod and a wink;” out of the other side of his mouth, he seems to say to those who want to change Doctrine and the Church or who want to go on living a pagan life without the baggage of “rules”: “O. K., I have to say this and that, because I’m Pope . . . but, just ignore all the Haters and go ahead with what you’re doing; I’m really with YOU. We’ll bring people along”

    Yes, . . . Pastors should have the smell of their sheep — but, not follow them in wallowing in the stench of the mirey pasture.

    This deeply troubles me.


    • steveesq says:

      I agree. In fact, it bothers me tremendously that this stuff comes from our Pope. I’ve tackled this in previous posts, and it’s a common theme that keeps coming through. I wish it wasn’t so but I cannot ignore what is being said and done. I find that it must be that someone else writes the orthodox stuff for him, and when he speaks he reveals that he doesn’t hold the fullness of the Faith, and what he really believes.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Recent Posts

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

News You May Not Have Heard About

Biblical Teachings, News in American, World News, Misc. News, Teachings, Israel News, Genealogy News, Earth News, Petition News, Archaeology News, Lost 10 Tribes of Israel News, Health News, Religion News, Jihad News, Prophecy News, Syria, Russia, Palestine, Israel, Africa, England, U.K., Spain, Germany, Italy


Thoughts and research from the middle

Stately Blaska Manor

gracious residence of David Blaska, your humble squire and irascible bloggeur, reporting from The Emerald City, Madison Wisconsin. DO NOT DUMB HERE! NOT DUMB AREA HERE!

grace steps

Muddling Through Life, Parenting and Childhood Cancer By His Grace


We are members of a Jesus to Mankind prayer group and Crusaders in the Remnant Army in Jesus' final Mission to Save Souls

Truth2Freedom's Blog

The mindset in postmodernism is that objective truth does not exist. But in post-truth, the person believes that objective truth exists, but they subordinate truth to their preferences, or their comfort. In other words, one doesn’t care that truth exists or what the truth is if it doesn’t line up with one’s preferences. "There is but one straight course, and that is to seek truth and pursue it steadily" - George Washington letter to Edmund Randolph — 1795. Faith in Jesus Christ is our response to God's elective purpose in our life. These two truths--God's initiative and man's response--co-exist throughout the Bible. The gospel is "the message of truth" because truth is its predominant characteristic. Salvation was conceived by the God of truth (Ps. 31:5); purchased by the Son, who is the truth (John 14:6); and is applied by the Spirit of truth (John 16:13). To know it is to know the truth that sets men free (John 8:32). Believers are people of the truth (John 18:37), who worship God in spirit and in truth (John 4:24), and who obey the Word of truth (John 17:17). People have rejected, neglected, redefined, and opposed God’s truth for centuries. Some cynically deny that truth even exists or that it can be known by men (John 18:38). Others foolishly think that denying truth will somehow make it go away. Truth determines the validity of one's belief. Believing a lie doesn't make it true. Conversely, failing to believe the truth doesn't make it a lie. The gospel is true because Jesus is true, not simply because Christians believe in Him. His resurrection proved the truth of His claims and constitutes the objective basis of our faith (Rom. 1:4; 1 Pet. 1:3). Truth is our protection and strength (Eph. 6:14). Throughout history, people have tried everything imaginable to gain favor with God. Most turn to religion, but religion apart from Christ is merely a satanic counterfeit of the truth. At the heart of every false religion is the notion that man can come to God by any means he chooses--by meditating, doing good deeds, and so on. But Scripture says, "There is no other name under heaven that has been given among men, by which we must be saved" (Acts 4:12). That name is Jesus Christ, and we come to Him by confessing and repenting of our sin, trusting in His atoning death on the cross, and affirming His bodily resurrection from the grave (cf. Rom. 10:9-10). There is no other way to God. False religious leaders and teachers talk much about God’s love, but not His wrath and holiness; much about how deprived of good things people are, but not about their depravity; much about God’s universal fatherhood toward everyone, but not much about his unique fatherhood toward all who believe in His Son; much about what God wants to give to us, but nothing about the necessity of obedience to Him; much about health and happiness, but nothing about holiness and sacrifice. Their message is full of gaps, the greatest of which leaves out a biblical worldview of the saving gospel and replaces it with the worldview of postmodernism with its dominant ethical system of relativism. The Bible describes mankind in the end times: “always learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth” (2 Tim. 3:7). Spiritual answers cannot be deduced by human reason alone (1 Cor. 2:14). It’s not that spiritual truth is irrational or illogical, but that human wisdom is defective, because it’s tainted by man’s sinfulness, and unable to perceive the things of God. That is why the Bible is so important. It gives us the answers we can’t find on our own. It is God’s Word to mankind. Scripture is divinely revealed truth that fills the vacuum of spiritual ignorance in all of us. Post-truth is the word of the year for 2016 and also the philosophy of the day, According to the dictionary, “post-truth” means, “relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief.” Simply put, we now live in a culture that seems to value experience and emotion more than truth. In a “post-truth” world, people make choices based on emotion and experience rather than objective fact. So in a post-truth world, truth is irrelevant. What exactly is a post-truth culture? It’s a culture where truth is no longer an objective reality. It has become subjective. It’s what’s true for me—my beliefs, my opinions, determine my truth. So in our post-truth culture, man determines truth. Man makes himself the ultimate authority. This starting point, which rejects God’s Word and the idea of moral absolutes, makes truth subjective. Truth will never go away no matter how hard one might wish. Christianity is grounded in objective truth. “And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free” (John 8:32). Objective truth exists because we have God’s Word. In the Gospel of John, Jesus says, “Sanctify them by Your truth. Thy word is truth” (John 17:17), and Paul and James describe the Bible as “the word of truth” (2 Timothy 2:15; James 1:18). The Psalmist says, “The entirety of your word is truth” (Psalm 119:160). Jesus Himself said, “For this cause I was born, and for this cause I have come into the world, that I should bear witness to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth hears My voice” (John 18:37). When Jesus said, “I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life. No one comes to the Father except by me” (John 14:6), He wasn’t expressing His personal belief or opinion. He was speaking the truth, a fundamental reality that doesn’t change from person to person. It doesn’t matter if our culture thinks all roads lead to God. The truth of the matter is “no one comes to the Father but by [Jesus].” This blogs goal is to, in some small way, put a plug in the broken dam of truth and save as many as possible from the consequences—temporal and eternal. "The further a society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those who speak it." - George Orwell

Pesky Truth

Political News, Commentary and Humor

New York Post

Your source for breaking news, news about New York, sports, business, entertainment, opinion, real estate, culture, fashion, and more.

Big Picture News, Informed Analysis

This blog is written by Canadian journalist Donna Laframboise. Posts appear Monday & Wednesday.

Tedium: The Dull Side of the Internet.

Latin For OUT OF GREAT SILENCE: An Orthodox Traditional Modern Catholic Layman's Perspective

The Catholic Gentleman

A blog for Catholic men that seeks to encourage virtue, the pursuit of holiness and the art of true masculinity.


Taking small steps each day to become a little healthier

C.J.'s Roku World

Roku for beginner's

Frugal Fixes

Fixes that save money and sometimes even the environment.

Tech Halfpipe

Over 20 years working with technology and that I'm also a geek at home, as a personal distraction, I thought I would share some the tech solutions and challenges that I come across, and hopefully some solutions. Also will share some of the exciting things going on with STEM and the education of our youth

Archived Innings

An exploration of the National Pastime

The Baseball Bloggess

Loves the 4-6-3 and the Serial Comma.

Race Communications Blog

Follow our blog for a more in-depth look at our fiber projects across California.

POTs and PANs

Pretty Advanced New Stuff from CCG Consulting

Nickels, Dimes and Quarters


The Minimalists Next Door

Living simply, frugally, and intentionally


Entrepreneur, Speaker, Author

Lefthanded Conservative

I'm left-handed, although my views are on the right

Credo Sanctum

Following the Apostolic Fatih

non veni pacem

The Splendor of Truth


Surprising contributions by Francis to the Magisterium...

Maureen Mullarkey: Studio Matters

Latin For OUT OF GREAT SILENCE: An Orthodox Traditional Modern Catholic Layman's Perspective

Real Science

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" - Richard Feynman

Our Game

Official Blog of MLB Historian John Thorn

The Hardball Times

Latin For OUT OF GREAT SILENCE: An Orthodox Traditional Modern Catholic Layman's Perspective

FanGraphs Baseball

Latin For OUT OF GREAT SILENCE: An Orthodox Traditional Modern Catholic Layman's Perspective

One Mad Mom

Crazy? Angry? You decide and I couldn't care less!


Latin For OUT OF GREAT SILENCE: An Orthodox Traditional Modern Catholic Layman's Perspective

Athanasius Contra Mundum

A website for Catholic Theology, Tradition, and Opposition to an insane world.

LI & NY Places that are no more

A fun look back at history by Todd Berkun

Mahound's Paradise

Latin For OUT OF GREAT SILENCE: An Orthodox Traditional Modern Catholic Layman's Perspective


An online journal edited by the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Richmond N.H.

Pauliebronx's Blog

Just another WordPress.com site

The Catholic Husband

24 Years Happily Married and Counting...

The Counter Jihad Report

News ~ Resources ~ Activism

The Stumbling Block

There's nothing good or Catholic about liberalism

%d bloggers like this: